Menu
Pro Login/Register
Shop

14′ x 28″ Performance Touring iSUP Test 2024 / SUPBOARDER PRO HEAD TO HEAD

In this SUPboarder PRO head to head test we put 8 "Performance Touring" boards up against each other. Performance Touring ( approx. 14' x 28) are becoming more popular with intermediate and advanced paddlers as you want to paddle further and faster. In this test we share what we discovered about this category of boards and talk through the pros and cons of each, helping you decide which is right for you.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

20 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ben Williams
Ben Williams
3 months ago

I’ve never understood the logic of the d ring under the nose of a board, yet so many have this so must be a reason. On top of the nose would seem more useful in a variety of situations but certainly redundant when a handle is there. For me the Quroc looks really interesting as a multi day board but how does the new bungy layout compare to the previous style layout like the starboard for securing a load?

Ben Sharp
Ben Sharp
1 month ago
Reply to  Ben Williams

The D ring is for towing, if you tow from the top of a craft it pulls the nose down into the water increasing drag. Strong points for towing on boats are always low down so the bow is pulled upwards which lifts the bow out and provides a nicer tow.

Reuben Ellis
Admin
1 month ago
Reply to  Ben Sharp

Hey Ben thanks for the comment. We find when we do towing from our boats or other SUPs (maybe to get to a testing locations with lots of boards) the top handle always works fine. If there’s no towing eye underneath. What you are saying is very true about the better angle of tow when underneath. But the majority of paddlers we have spoken to just don’t use it. But I guess its there if you need it.

Giorgio Borgonovo
Giorgio Borgonovo
3 months ago

Hi guys, thank you for another interesting test!
I do like the idea of clearly explain to whom each single board is better suited for based on each board own characteristics, but I would still have appreciated having the traditional “scoring per characteristic”, like gliding, tracking, rigidity, stability, personal overall preference and such.
Hope you would be able to add the info to this test data in the near future, in case you have collected such data during the test, or at least that you re-introduce those data into future tests.
Cheers,
Giorgio

Giorgio Borgonovo
Giorgio Borgonovo
3 months ago
Reply to  Will Rogers

Thank you Will, much appreciated!
Cheers,
Giorgio

CharlieF
CharlieF
3 months ago

Thank you Reuben and team, plus the guest reviewers. That was a super interesting and very comprehensive review. I really liked how clearly you explained everything for multiple boards in different scenarios – the format worked very well.

Glad you brought up the D-ring topic as I also find it peculiar that they’re often placed where they’ll create unecessary drag. I sometimes put tape over mine to minimise that, but it can get worn or knocked off easily.

Reuben Ellis
Admin
3 months ago
Reply to  CharlieF

Hey Charlie, Good to hear you liked the test and the way it was put together. The D ring on noses is a funny one, depending on where there’re placed can makes a big difference on the board. Let’s see if Starboard change theres into the future?

Danila
Danila
2 months ago

Hi.
If possible, please add information about the volume of the board to the size table. In the review you repeatedly pointed out that Shark is the widest and longest SUP, but if you look at the volume, it is only 3 liters larger than Starboard, which doesn’t seem to be a significant difference.

Dragan
Dragan
1 month ago

Gladiator 14×28 vs Bluefin Nitro 14×28??

Can someone suggest what would be the winner between those two taking in consideration same price level..
From my experience, Bluefin paddles are awful, so would definitely neet to upgrade soon, but overall quality is very good. Never had experience with Gladiator.

Last edited 1 month ago by Dragan
Reuben Ellis
Admin
1 month ago
Reply to  Dragan

Hey Dragan. The Bluefins have got better with their quality but the Gladiator is the better again. The shape of the Gladiator is just more refined and works well. Any help? Reuben

Dragan
Dragan
1 month ago
Reply to  Reuben Ellis

Hey Reuben.
I’ve tried those romblike shape boards, although seems unstable, they are not, untill stepback turn..
Exept for long touring trips I use it occasinaly with small child of 25kg approx.
I’m 190, 95kg, do you think board will be capable to carry both with good glide?
Tnx

Reuben Ellis
Admin
1 month ago
Reply to  Dragan

Hey Dragan, what do you mean by romblike shape boards?

Dragan
Dragan
1 month ago
Reply to  Reuben Ellis

Hi, like pointed nose and tail instead of square tail.. example are Gladiator 14×28 or Itiwit race or touring vs Bluefin Nitro, if you can see the shape difference..

Reuben Ellis
Admin
1 month ago
Reply to  Dragan

Yeah got you. Like you say when paddling in normal paddling stance they are pretty stable , especially the longer boards, like 14. But the wider tails will offer more stability overall, and will make a big difference in choppy or moving waters.

Samuel Pitt
Samuel Pitt
6 days ago

Great review!
Any experiences with Gong boards that fit into this category?

Reuben Ellis
Admin
4 days ago
Reply to  Samuel Pitt

Hey Samuel, unfortunately we haven’t had any experience with the longer Gongs. We have use some other Gongs in the past and they have always been well designed and thought about. Maybe only observation in the past is some of the fittings like fins et cetera have not been as good quality as rival brands. But this was a couple years ago now. They generally hit a good price point.

Related brand posts

Related posts

QR: 14′ x 28″ Performance Touring iSUP Test 2024 / SUPBOARDER PRO HEAD TO HEAD

Brand Partners

20
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x